Skip to main content

The Ethics of Social Research

Why Should I Care?

MP PLEASE ADD - COMMENT

Research projects may incur harm. This issue has to be dealt with by universities to reduce the harm, and make sure that research is designed as ethically as possible.

Definitions

  • Morals: What is right and wrong, as defined by social norms, traditions, religion, and other  institutions. Values.
  • Ethics:  What is right and wrong, as argued by a philosophy, a set of logical conclusions, stemming from premises and assumptions.
  • Deontology: A set of rules that govern conduct, such as law, regulations, and professional practices.

Example of Moral-Ethical conflict

Where do you place the following events?


Ethical

Non-Ethical

Moral

Abortion becomes legal 1969


Immoral

Abortion ~1960 in progressive academia

Abortion 1955

Major Principles of Ethical Theory

  • Harms-Benefits:
    A tally of advantages and disadvantages of a certain decision or action.

  • Logic and Intentions (Kant):
    Where the ends are put in context with the intentions behind the decision or action. 

Ethical considerations for researchers

Researchers have a responsibility to be truthful and transparent about:

a) the sources of their ideas: researchers must acknowledge the work of others

b) their actual findings

c) who the research participants were and how they were treated

Ethical considerations when studying individuals

Researchers also have the obligations to treat their participants with decency and dignity. Participants have the following rights

Protection from harm: Participants cannot be inflicted physical or psychological harm. 

Informed consent: participants must be told about all features of a study that may affect their willingness to participate. In the case of children, parents must give their consent: children of any age also have the right to choose not to participate. 

Confidentiality: Participants have the right to have their identity concealed on all collected data except in regards to suspected abuse. 

Debriefing: Any deception related to the concealment of info to the participants for the purpose of the study must be disclosed following the end of the study. Deception is sometimes necessary to stude phenomenon that would otherwise be impossible to detect (ex., do employers discriminate against jobseekers with foreign names?)

Knowledge of the results: receive a copy of their signed consent form, and information about who to contact if you should have any questions.

When you develop a research project, you should consider ethical issues that may arise from the very beginning. Rule of thumb: put yourself in the participants’ shoes.



The University Rules of Ethics

REWRITE

A review committee gives green light to projects, including student research, and faculty research done outside the realms of the university. Projects are reviewed only if they are done on “humans.”

Harms-Benefits is the guiding principle.

If benefits outweigh harms, and harms are not critical, then studies get ok.

Reputational risks and potential legal actions are taken seriously.

Zimbardo experiment would never be done today.

Social science that may do harm to public figures are excluded from the review process. If harm is deemed excessive, people can use the courts to litigate for libel or defamation.

Dawson Research Ethics Board

http://www.dawsoncollege.qc.ca/research-ethics-board/

McGill Policy on the Ethical Conduct of Research Involving Human Participants

http://www.mcgill.ca/medresearch/files/medresearch/policy_on_the_ethical_conduct_of_research_involving_human_participants_2-2013.pdf


LICENSES AND ATTRIBUTIONS