Skip to main content

Chapter 11: Build for the Back Row

Chapter 11: Build for the Back Row

A slide that looks perfectly readable on your laptop may be almost impossible to read from the back of a presentation room. That creates a simple design rule: Don't design for your screen. Design for your audience. Your slides need to communicate quickly and from a distance. Avoid:

  • tiny text;

  • long paragraphs;

  • complicated tables;

  • excessive footnotes;

  • cluttered charts;

  • unnecessary decoration;

  • overly precise numbers;

  • anything that forces the judge to squint.

If the judges are trying to read your slide, they are probably not fully listening to you.

The Slide Has Two Communicators

Every presentation has two things communicating simultaneously:

The Slide

Shows:

  • the message;

  • the evidence;

  • the visual;

  • the important numbers.

The Presenter

Provides:

  • interpretation;

  • context;

  • explanation;

  • emphasis;

  • connection.

These two should complement each other. They should not compete. If your slide contains every sentence you plan to say, the audience has a choice: Do I read or do I listen? Don't force them to make that choice.

Reduce the Cognitive Load

Every slide asks the audience to process information. Consider what happens when a new slide appears. The judge must quickly determine:

  1. What am I looking at?

  2. Where should I look first?

  3. What does this chart show?

  4. Which number matters?

  5. What is the presenter saying?

  6. How does this connect to the previous slide?

  7. Why does this matter to the recommendation?

That is a significant cognitive task. Good design reduces the effort required to answer those questions. You can reduce cognitive load through:

  • fewer words;

  • clear hierarchy;

  • simple visuals;

  • consistent formatting;

  • meaningful whitespace;

  • clear labels;

  • logical sequencing;

  • selective emphasis.

The easier the slide is to process, the more attention the audience can devote to your argument.

Design for Distance

Before finalising the deck, move away from the screen. Can you still read:

  • the title?

  • the chart labels?

  • the important numbers?

  • the axes?

  • the key callouts?

If not, neither may the judges. This becomes particularly important with:

  • financial tables;

  • implementation plans;

  • alternative matrices;

  • sensitivity analyses;

  • market maps.

Teams often try to squeeze too much information into these slides because the analysis is highly detailed. Remember, judges don't need to see your spreadsheet; they need to understand what the spreadsheet discovered.

Don't Shrink. Simplify.

One of the most dangerous PowerPoint habits is solving an overcrowded slide by reducing the font size. The slide does not fit. So the team makes the text smaller. It still does not fit. So they make it smaller again. Eventually everything fits. But nobody can read it. When something doesn't fit, don't immediately ask, "How can we make this smaller?" Ask:

  1. "What can we remove?" or:
  2. "Should this become two slides?" or:
  3. "Can we communicate this visually?" or:
  4. "Does the audience actually need this?"

Simplification is usually better than shrinking.

Whitespace Is Working Space

Teams sometimes see empty space and think: "We could put something there." Don't. Whitespace helps the audience understand:

  • what belongs together;

  • what is separate;

  • what deserves attention.

It also gives important information room to breathe. A slide does not need to look full to be complete. Empty space can be evidence of good editing.

Simplify Tables

Tables are particularly dangerous in case presentations. Imagine a financial comparison containing:

  • seven alternatives;

  • eight metrics;

  • three years;

  • percentages;

  • dollar amounts;

  • assumptions.

It may be analytically impressive. But the judge cannot interpret it in twenty seconds. Ask what conclusion from this table actually matters? Perhaps the real message is: Alternative B creates the greatest value with the lowest initial investment. Show the key metrics supporting that conclusion. Put the detailed analysis in the appendix.

Simplify Numbers

Financial analysis often creates unnecessary visual complexity.

  • Compare:
    • $9,873,462.71 with: $9.9M or:
    • 17.3842% with: 17.4%

The first may be more mathematically precise. The second may be more useful for communication. Your level of precision should reflect the decision. In many cases, your numbers are estimates based on assumptions anyway. Excessive decimal places can create the illusion of precision without improving the decision.

Simplify Charts

Charts should communicate the insight, not prove that you know how to use Excel. Remove elements that do not help:

  • unnecessary gridlines;

  • redundant legends;

  • excessive data labels;

  • decorative borders;

  • irrelevant categories;

  • unnecessary decimals.

Then ask, "Can the judge see the pattern immediately?" If yes, the chart is doing its job.

Consistency Matters

Consistency creates professionalism and, more importantly, reduces cognitive load. If every slide follows completely different design rules, the audience has to keep relearning how to read your deck. Establish rules for:

  • fonts;

  • font sizes;

  • headings;

  • alignment;

  • margins;

  • chart styles;

  • footnotes;

  • page numbers;

  • colours;

  • spacing;

  • terminology.

Then follow them.

Consistency of Language Matters Too

Design consistency is not only visual.

  • Suppose one slide says: High-Value Customers
  • another says: Premium Segment
  • another says: Tier-One Consumers

Are these the same people? The team may know, the judges may not. Use consistent terminology throughout the presentation. The same applies to:

  • recommendation names;

  • phases;

  • alternatives;

  • financial metrics;

  • strategic priorities;

  • customer groups.

Don't make the audience translate your terminology.

Consistency Without Monotony

Consistency does not mean every slide must look identical. Different information requires different visual treatments.

  • A financial slide may look different from an implementation timeline.
  • A customer journey may look different from an alternatives matrix.

What should remain consistent is the visual language:

  • typography;

  • hierarchy;

  • spacing;

  • colours;

  • formatting;

  • terminology.

The deck should read like a single presentation, not four teammates' slides pasted together.

The Back-Row Test

Before finalising the deck:

  1. Put the presentation into slideshow mode.

  2. Stand several metres away.

  3. Look at each slide briefly.

  4. Ask:

    • Can I read the headline?
    • Can I identify the key evidence?
    • Can I see the important number?
    • Can I understand the basic visual?
    • Do I know where to look first?

If not, simplify.

Discover Your MAD Skills Principle

Don't make the judges work harder than necessary to understand your thinking.

Good design reduces friction between your idea and your audience.

The Bottom Line

Build for the audience, not your laptop. Use: Less Text + Clear Hierarchy + Simple Visuals + Whitespace + Consistency. When a slide becomes overcrowded: Don't shrink it. Simplify it.

Back to top