Chapter 23: Proving the Economics
Chapter 23: Proving the Economics - Financial Support for the Recommendation
Video: Financial Analysis in Cases: Situation Review, Modelling, and Sensitivity
Video: Situational Financial Analysis Ratios, Solvency, Efficiency & Leverage
Video: Comparative Financial Analysis: Historical vs Industry Benchmarks, Debt vs Equity, Etc.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this chapter, you should be able to:
- translate a recommendation into financial consequences
- identify the major financial assumptions
- estimate costs and benefits
- explain expected financial impact
- test different scenarios
- present financial information clearly to decision makers
Why This Matters
Senior decision makers are going to ask:
- How much will this cost?
- What will we get in return?
- How long will it take?
- What happens if our assumptions are wrong?
Your financial analysis should answer these questions before the judges have to ask them.
Emphasise one-time and ongoing costs, financial value, feasibility, pro forma statements, best- and worst-case scenarios, and tying the analysis to profit.
Discover Your Mad Skills Principle
Financial analysis should prove the decision—not decorate the presentation.
Start With the Decision
Don't build a financial model simply because the case contains numbers. Start with: What financial question do we need to answer? It might be:
- Is this investment worthwhile?
- Can the company afford it?
- How quickly will it pay back?
- How much profit could it generate?
- What level of adoption is required?
- Which alternative creates the greatest value?
The financial model should answer that question.
The Financial Story
A useful financial story might look like:
Investment à New Revenue / Savings à Incremental Costs à Incremental Profit à Return / Payback à Value Created
That is much more useful than simply presenting a large spreadsheet.
Assumptions
Make your assumptions visible. For example:
- number of customers;
- conversion rate;
- average transaction value;
- price;
- growth rate;
- variable cost;
- fixed investment;
- implementation timing.
The judges should be able to see where your numbers come from.
Best Case / Base Case / Worst Case
A single forecast can create false confidence.
Instead, where appropriate, show a range.
- Best Case: What happens if key assumptions outperform?
- Base Case: What is the most reasonable expectation?
- Worst Case: What happens if important assumptions disappoint?
This demonstrates that your team understands uncertainty.
Coach's Lens
Don't hide uncertainty. Use it to demonstrate judgment. A statement such as: "Our recommendation remains financially attractive unless adoption falls below 18%" can be much more powerful than: "Our projected ROI is 24.7%." The first statement tells the judges what matters.
Visualising Financials
Your existing presentation material strongly emphasises simplifying financials: highlight the key metrics, use charts rather than raw tables where possible, remove unnecessary detail, and make the meaning of the numbers immediately visible. The slide should answer: So what? Not: Can you read this spreadsheet?
Common Mistakes
- Too Much Detail
- The judges don't need your entire model.
- Unsupported Assumptions
- Show where the assumptions come from.
- False Precision
- Don't pretend uncertain estimates are exact.
- Ignoring Costs
- Revenue alone does not create value.
- Ignoring Timing
- A profitable project can still create short-term cash challenges.
Mad Skills Drill
Take your recommendation. Build a one-page financial case containing:
- initial investment;
- ongoing costs;
- expected revenue or savings;
- incremental profit;
- one relevant return measure;
- one critical assumption;
- one sensitivity.
Then explain the entire financial case in 30 seconds.
Chapter Summary
Strong financial analysis answers: Does the recommendation create enough value to justify the investment, cost, and risk? The goal is not complexity. The goal is decision usefulness.
Key Takeaways
✓ Start with the financial question.
✓ Make assumptions visible.
✓ Focus on key drivers.
✓ Show financial impact.
✓ Test critical assumptions.
✓ Present the insight, not the spreadsheet.
Looking Ahead
Financial feasibility tells us whether the recommendation makes sense. Now we need to answer the question: How do we actually execute it?