Search Results

A case competition presentation is a team performance. The judges are not evaluating four separate presenters; they are evaluating whether the team collectively understands, believes, and can defend One Recommendation. That means teamwork must be visible in: ...

One of the most important lessons for developing case-solving judgment is that you don't have to use a framework. Frameworks are tools, not requirements. Sometimes a framework will help you see something that would otherwise be difficult to identify. Sometimes...

A strong case solution still needs to be understood. Once the analysis is complete, the alternatives have been evaluated, and the recommendation has been developed, your team must decide how to communicate the solution as a clear and persuasive story. The pres...

A strong case solution does not automatically become a strong case presentation. Once the strategy is developed, your team must make another series of decisions: What does the audience need to understand, believe, and remember? That means deciding what to incl...

Strong case teams often generate more good ideas than they can or should recommend. Some ideas may be strategically attractive but depend on capabilities that don't yet exist. Others may require additional investment, research, market validation, or simply mor...

Every recommendation involves uncertainty. The goal of a strong case solution is not to pretend that risk can be eliminated. It is to demonstrate that your team understands what could prevent the recommendation from succeeding and how the organisation should r...

A recommendation tells the organisation what it should do. Implementation explains how it will actually happen. This is where strategy becomes execution. A strong implementation plan demonstrates that your team has thought beyond the idea. It identifies the ac...

Strong case solving ultimately leads to a decision. After deciphering the case, analysing the situation, and evaluating alternatives, your team must determine what the organisation should actually do. A strong recommendation is more than a good idea. It is a c...

Once the team understands the problem and has developed meaningful insights, the next question is: what could the organisation actually do? This is where many case solutions become weaker. Teams often jump from analysis directly to a favourite idea. They find ...

Once you have deciphered the case and understood the organisation, you need a structure for turning that understanding into a decision. Case solving can feel chaotic. There is information everywhere. There are multiple problems. There are competing perspe...

Case competitions do not reward perfect conditions. They test what happens when: time is tight; the room feels unfamiliar; a teammate makes a mistake; a judge challenges your reasoning; you forget a line; the presentation does not...

Before you can solve a case, you need to understand what you are actually trying to solve. This sounds obvious. It isn't. One of the biggest mistakes case-solving teams make is starting their analysis too quickly. They see a familiar problem, reach for a famil...

Before learning frameworks, financial models, presentation techniques, or specific case-solving tools, you must develop a Case Solver's Mindset. Case competitions are not simply tests of business knowledge. They test how you think, how you work with others, ho...

Emeritus Professor | Coach & Mentor to Aspiring Professionals | Helping the Next Generation Discover Their “MAD Skills” © 2026 Discover Your MAD Skills Toolkit

Before you compete, ask the following: 1. Clarity: Can the judges understand our solution? 2. Relevance: Does every major piece of content matter? 3. Logic: Does the evidence lead logically to the recommendation? 4. Credibility: Do we come across as people...

Resource: PDF Version Available for Purchase Decipher Do we understand the audience? Do we understand the decision? Do we understand the case characteristics? Do we know what the judges need to believe? Have we decided what does not need to be communic...

You have built the argument. You have designed the deck. You know the story. You have prepared the delivery and anticipated the questions. Now you need to make it work under competition conditions. Practice is not simply repeating the presentation until everyo...

A strong deck is not built by starting at Slide 1 and working forward. It's built by making a series of communication decisions in the right order. The goal is to move from: Case → Message → Story → Evidence → Slides → Delivery. This part brings together the e...

The presentation does not end when the final slide appears. Q&A is where judges test the depth behind the presentation. They may challenge your assumptions, calculations, alternatives, recommendations, implementation plan, risk analysis, or understanding of th...

The final slide does not mean the presentation is over. Your close is the last opportunity to reinforce the problem, recommendation, and impact before the judges begin testing your thinking. Done well, it brings the presentation full circle and leaves the audi...