Skip to main content

Episode 53: 302 Teams. 180+ Podiums. 5 Lessons That Still Win.

After 20+ years coaching and mentoring over 300 case teams at the University of Calgary and the Haskayne School of Business (plus dozens more through events like How to Change the World, Innovatank's WXP, and classroom advising), I still get that same electric rush every time a team steps up and delivers.

The numbers are nice to brag about:

  • πŸ† 180+ podium finishes across 302 teams
  • πŸ… 7 coaching awards along the way
  • πŸš€ A handful of classroom ideas that actually turned into real ventures

But honestly? It's the hard-earned lessons, not the trophies, that make the biggest difference, both in competitions and in building meaningful careers.

I'm still very much in the arena, passing these lessons on. Just in the last few weeks:

You'd think after two decades, the core lessons would evolve or get stale. Spoiler: they really don't. Here are a few recent standouts that reminded me why these timeless truths still win every time.

The Team That Won at How to Change the World (and Why It Mattered)

In the Global Sustainability Project Bootcamp, my cohort dove into sustainability challenges in SΓ£o Paulo. I had the privilege of mentoring the winning team. Their solution? A practical way to help underprivileged seniors get to and from medical appointments.

On paper, simple. In execution, exceptional.

What separated them: genuine empathy baked into the design. They listened deeply and discovered realities many overlook:

  • Not every household has a smartphone per person
  • Often it's one shared device
  • Connectivity isn't reliable
  • Access is never equal

They didn't design for the "ideal" user; they designed for the "real user." When mentors pushed back, they didn't dig in and defend. They Listened. They Adapted. They Refined. They Iterated. That single habit, evolving instead of entrenching, wins more competitions (and builds stronger careers) than raw intelligence ever could.

The Most Creative Team at How to Change the World

Another group I judged flipped the script entirely. Instead of tweaking what already works (what most call "creative"), they challenged the whole system, reimagining healthcare funding in underserved communities.

  • Perfect? No.
  • Feasible tomorrow? Absolutely Not.
  • Bold and truly creative? 100%.

Real innovation rarely comes from recycling answers. It comes from asking braver, better questions that let you bang on (or break through) the walls of the box. Word of caution: this is "go big or go home" territory. You'll need to defend it fiercely, and some will get scared off. That doesn't make it wrong; it just makes it harder.

Multiple Wins for the EngComm Team

The UCalgary squad that competed at ENGCOMM World 2026 in Montreal came home loaded:

  • πŸ₯ˆ2nd place overall
  • πŸ†Most Economically Feasible Solution
  • πŸ†Best Business Case
  • πŸ†Best Team Chemistry
  • πŸ†Best Speaker

Plus, they swept all 3 prelim cases in their pool.

Their secret sauce? A battle-tested system (8 finalists in my last 9 appearances as coach), killer chemistry under pressure, obsessive scorecard management, flexible presentation structure, sharp Q&A handling, picking battles wisely, constant assumption-checking, and tweaking the narrative to fit the judges in the room.

A few keys worth unpacking:

  1. Obsessive Scorecard Management β€” They checked the scorecard throughout to stay laser-focused on what judges actually value.
  2. Flexible Presentation Structure β€” Engineering-heavy case? Lead with tech details. Business-heavy? Nail the business case first. But always hook the judges early and weave it into one cohesive story, not just a slide deck.
  3. Picking Battles Wisely β€” In those frantic prep windows, they chose which challenges to tackle hardest.
  4. Tweaking the Narrative β€” They read the room during intros and adjusted, e.g., more marketing emphasis if the client's marketing rep was judging.

In the final, they didn't play it safe. They challenged convention again and rattled a few judges, but executed so well they still brought home serious hardware. Risky? Yes. Worth it? Clearly.

So What Does 20+ Years Really Teach Us?

The consistent winners aren't always the flashiest or most polished. They're the ones who:

  1. Seek feedback instead of validation
  2. Adapt instead of defend
  3. Design for reality, not theory
  4. Have the courage to think differently
  5. Stay in the arena (even when it's uncomfortable)

When they do this, they become polished and become the authority in the room.

The future is in seriously good hands, as long as we keep creating spaces where testing, rethinking, and evolving feel safe. To every student who's stepped up over the years: massive respect. Real change doesn't start with perfection; it starts with participation, and post-secondary education needs to offer many more opportunities to participate in these spaces.

Quick question for the students and young professionals reading this: What's one piece of feedback you initially resisted... but later realised actually made you better? Drop it in the comments, I'd genuinely love to hear your stories. πŸ‘‡

My big advice: Keep pushing. Keep iterating.

PS. In the coming weeks, on Discover Your Mad Skills: Unbarred Conversations, I interview two former case team members and a world-class coach about their journeys. Stay tuned!